Kudos to Nathaniel Adam Tobias Coleman for this excellent article.
She writes: “We cannot decide who our children are…” If only mainstream bioethics lit could accept this simple, yet powerful, statement.
See philosopher Ellen Feder’s post here, on the IJFAB blog.
I’m really looking forward to working on my summer project (funded by a Stetson grant), in which I will seek answers to the following questions: Why are disabled bodies so useful to the movements and patterns of horror film and fiction? Further, is it possible that there are alternatives embedded in horror for seeing disability differently, insofar as it is so often and provocatively on display in these fictions?
While I take cues from the path cut by scholars working on the philosophy of disability, I am concerned that common analyses in this literature do not capture the depth of horror’s peculiar intimacy with images of disability. In the work of Julia Kristeva on psychoanalysis and semiotics (e.g. 1982) and Noël Carroll on the philosophy of horror (e.g. 1981, 1987, 1999), I hope to find new ways to analyze the layered uses of disability in the horror genre. Second, I seek to bear out my intuition that some members of the horror genre provide alternative ways to view disability that need not be considered pernicious. Indeed, I hypothesize some horror fiction effectively familiarizes disability and relocates the horror response to a new monster: hierarchical normalization processes, functioning in the social world, that exclude those who are different.
My plan of activities includes: viewing as many films in the horror genre as my weak stomach can handle, exploring mass market horror fiction, and critically examining work in film studies for varied resources to understand the use of disability in horror fiction.
If you come across offbeat horror – movies or lit – that uses disability to create or augment horror (or, that has a disabled protagonist!) please contact me! I’d love to check it out and discuss it.
very exciting new journal.
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly (FPQ) is an online, open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting feminist philosophical scholarship. We welcome submissions from all areas and traditions of feminist philosophy, and our goal is to be a platform for philosophical research that engages the problems of our time in the broader world.
As an open-access journal, our goal is to make feminist philosophical scholarship of the highest quality widely available, and so we are free to authors and to readers. We also aim to improve the presence and impact of women and feminist philosophers. We take considerations of implicit bias seriously, and employ the best practices of the profession, including triple-anonymous review.
We believe that all areas of feminist philosophical practice can contribute to social change, assisting those who strive for greater justice and equity and work against oppression in all forms. We endeavour to ally ourselves with others who are making…
View original post 54 more words